Lumifer comments on The Infinity Project - Less Wrong

-5 [deleted] 28 September 2015 01:14PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (50)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Lumifer 28 September 2015 03:32:13PM 2 points [-]

Anyone who defines a problem (Goal) on Infinity Project, gets hyper-equity, which allows the user to own a fixed percentage of all the future ḥ that will be generated from ideas, projects, steps, tasks, and works below that specific goal.

All these words and only for a pyramid scheme....

Comment author: Inyuki 28 September 2015 04:23:51PM 0 points [-]

All these words and only for a pyramid scheme....

If you look, currently the fraction of "hyper-equity" that a user can have, is very small (0.0001 to 0.001), and I believe we should use risk models to adjust it in the future, with everyone's help, and choose the appropriate maximum amount of it. The reason why we have so little of hyper-equity, is because it precisely because we would like to avoid an unreasonable pyramid scheme.

Comment author: Lumifer 28 September 2015 04:34:26PM 2 points [-]

If you look

I did try to look. My browser said "Secure Connection Failed".

the fraction of "hyper-equity" that a user can have, is very small (0.0001 to 0.001)

So, all of hyper-equity can be controlled by 1,000 - 10,000 people?

Comment author: Inyuki 28 September 2015 05:20:36PM *  0 points [-]

I did try to look. My browser said "Secure Connection Failed".

Ha:) Is that because we use self-signed SSL cert? Try again. We'll upgrade cert later.

So, all of hyper-equity can be controlled by 1,000 - 10,000 people?

No, as many people as there are problems (Goals). Potentially infinite.

Comment author: Kawoomba 28 September 2015 08:16:48PM 2 points [-]

If you're looking for gullible recruits, you've come to the wrong place.

Don't lease the Ferrari just yet.

Comment author: gjm 28 September 2015 09:56:36PM 5 points [-]

My impression is "naive" rather than "cynically looking for gullible recruits", for what it's worth.

Comment author: Lumifer 28 September 2015 11:58:24PM 4 points [-]

Yep, though the beginning, bolded in the original, is worrisome:

I strongly disliked the idea of 'work for money'.

Comment author: Inyuki 29 September 2015 02:06:22AM *  -1 points [-]

Is exciting! :) [To be rational, we must work for well-defined goals, not for money that lacks descriptive power.]

On the contrary, it is worrisome that some people treat others as merely workforce that can be bought, and lack any empathy whatsoever.

Comment author: Lumifer 29 September 2015 03:08:31AM 2 points [-]

we must work for well-defined goals, not for money that lacks descriptive power

So, who feeds you and pays for your housing?

Comment author: Inyuki 29 September 2015 03:19:01AM *  -1 points [-]

See, we are not talking about the modern world. We are talking about changing the world to create the world of abundance.