mgin comments on Reflexive self-processing is literally infinitely simpler than a many world interpretation - Less Wrong

-9 Post author: mgin 13 November 2015 02:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (16)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 14 November 2015 03:41:14PM 2 points [-]

Chris Langan

Uh-oh.

The idea of reflexive self-processing is that in the double slit experiment for example, which path the photon takes is calculated by taking into account the entire state of the universe when it solves the wave function.

That's effectively an appeal to non-local hidden variables, which isn't ruled out by current experiments, isn't very popular, and isn't very new.

  1. don't we already know that the entire state of the universe is used to calculate the behavior of particles? for example, doesn't every body produce a gravitational field which acts, with some magntitude of force, at any distance, such that in order to calculate the trajectory of a particle to the nth decimal place, you would need to know about every other body in the universe?

No, relativity is local, which is one of the the reasons NLHVs are unpopular. Note that having forces with infinite range doesnt imply nonlocality.

Comment author: mgin 18 November 2015 03:45:17AM 0 points [-]

doesn't gravity act at a distance? how is that "non-locality"?

Comment author: TheAncientGeek 18 November 2015 05:38:08PM 0 points [-]

Instantaneous action at a distance would be locality.

Comment author: Wes_W 19 November 2015 04:40:09AM 0 points [-]

Non-locality, surely? Or "would violate locality"?