With charity the topic is whether resentment produced through bombing is a significant factor.
Charity as to whose statements? Mine or Sipursky's?
Can you please quote or summarize the statement you are interpreting charitably.
TIA.
Charity as to whose statements?
Tsipursky's article. The article only provides one reason. There no reason to see it as arguing that the reason alone is sufficient.
Here's my op-ed that uses long-term orientation, probabilistic thinking, numeracy, consider the alternative, reaching our actual goals, avoiding intuitive emotional reactions and attention bias, and other rationality techniques to suggest more rational responses to the Paris attacks and the ISIS threat. It's published in the Sunday edition of The Plain Dealer, a major newspaper (16th in the US). This is part of my broader project, Intentional Insights, of conveying rational thinking, including about politics, to a broad audience to raise the sanity waterline.