username2 comments on LessWrong 2.0 - Less Wrong

89 Post author: Vaniver 09 December 2015 06:59PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (312)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: username2 07 December 2015 05:19:31PM 7 points [-]

There are an awful lot of ideas in this comment thread but many ideas have been proposed in the past. Without leadership, nothing's going to happen, and as I understand it the leaders of lw have left. Nate's been contacted? Ok, does he have decision making power? Is he an appropriate leader to have it? Will he use it? Well, I hope so, but the first step is a deliberate move to take ownership and end the headlessness

Comment author: So8res 13 December 2015 11:55:29PM 12 points [-]

I have the requisite decision-making power. I hereby delegate Vaniver to come up with a plan of action, and will use what power I have to see that that plan gets executed, so long as the plan seems unlikely to do more harm than good (but regardless of whether I think it will work). Vaniver and the community will need to provide the personpower and the funding, of course.

Comment author: Clarity 14 December 2015 12:07:21AM 2 points [-]

regardless of whether I think it will work

?

Comment author: Vaniver 14 December 2015 06:17:38PM *  5 points [-]

Read that as both Nate and me seeing me as more optimistic than him, and wanting to settle it by experiment (actually making the change and seeing if it helps), but this being limited to upside instead of downside.

That is, if I propose a change that "totally won't hurt" and Nate is sure it'll hurt, then Nate will go with his gut, but if I propose a change that "totally will help" and Nate is sure it won't help, then Nate will see what happens when we try.

Comment author: iarwain1 14 December 2015 01:00:57AM 1 point [-]

and the funding

A Kickstarter, perhaps?

Comment author: Vaniver 14 December 2015 06:36:19PM 1 point [-]

If it comes to that. I'm still figuring out what changes need to be made and what they'd take to make; one of them, for example, looks like it might just be flipping a config flag. Now, $1 to change and $99 to know where to change, but I know at least one person who's volunteered to donate some of that knowledge. (If you are interested in doing development work, either for pay or as a volunteer, please do reach out.)

Comment author: Lumifer 07 December 2015 06:45:27PM 4 points [-]

What's needed is not so much leadership as the simple capability to execute.

People who are interested in doing things have no control and people who have control are not interested.