ChristianKl comments on Smarter humans, not artificial intellegence - Less Wrong

-3 Post author: wubbles 30 November 2015 03:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ChristianKl 30 November 2015 09:33:27AM 0 points [-]

However, the impact is likely to be limited due to the cost of these methods which will prevent them from having population-wide influence

Why do you think so?

Comment author: wubbles 30 November 2015 12:19:45PM *  1 point [-]

Look at the cost of IVF: According to http://www.momjunction.com/articles/much-ivf-treatment-cost-india_0074672/ it is $450,000 Rs, which is $6,000 dollars. IVF is a prerequisite for the sort of genetic tampering we are talking about, unless you want to use rabies as a carrier. IVF is widely practiced and has few barriers to entry, making me think it won't get much cheaper. That is a lot of money for many parts of the world. To think this cost will come down in the next 10-20 years significantly requires believing that significant advances in automation of the process are possible: that might be true.

Financial incentives to have smarter children are likely to work better in those regions where $6,000 is a lot of money. It's possible that combining both strategies works even better.