Lumifer comments on Why CFAR? The view from 2015 - Less Wrong

46 Post author: PeteMichaud 23 December 2015 10:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (63)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 18 December 2015 03:40:43PM 5 points [-]

I don't claim that it developed skill and talent in all participants, nor even in the median participant.

And yet you called it "a resounding success". Does that mean that you're focusing on the crème de la crème, the top tier of the participants, while being less concerned with what's happening in lower quantiles?

Comment author: So8res 18 December 2015 05:37:15PM *  13 points [-]

Yes, precisely. (Transparency illusion strikes again! I had considered it obvious that the default outcome was "a few people are nudged slightly more towards becoming AI alignment researchers someday", and that the outcome of "actually cause at least one very talented person to become AI alignment researcher who otherwise would not have, over the course of three weeks" was clearly in "resounding success" territory, whereas "turn half the attendees into AI alignment researchers" is in I'll-eat-my-hat territory.)

Comment author: ciphergoth 19 December 2015 04:19:39PM 6 points [-]

For this unusual, MIRI-comissioned workshop, yes.