FeepingCreature comments on Why CFAR? The view from 2015 - Less Wrong

46 Post author: PeteMichaud 23 December 2015 10:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (63)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: FeepingCreature 25 December 2015 12:55:13AM 0 points [-]

book

Basically, systems that can improve from damage.

Comment author: ChristianKl 25 December 2015 07:39:07PM 0 points [-]

Basically, systems that can improve from damage.

The question isn't about what the word means in general but in what way CFAR's methods are supposedly antifragile.

Comment author: Lumifer 28 December 2015 04:01:01PM 1 point [-]

I know what the word means, kinda (Taleb isn't particularly coherent). I don't understand how CFAR's methods can improve from damage.