username2 comments on Voiceofra is banned - Less Wrong

21 Post author: NancyLebovitz 23 December 2015 06:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (222)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 24 December 2015 05:14:57PM 2 points [-]

The truth of a view is more important than whether or not it's abhorrent.

Amen. But the LW Terms of Use state:

You are explicitly prohibited from: [...] Posting or transmitting content through the Website that is harassing, threatens or encourages bodily harm, constitutes hate speech, or advocates for the destruction of property;

This case went beyond LW's usual attitude toward debate; this was explicit advocacy of violence, which should always be treated as Serious Business.

Comment author: username2 24 December 2015 10:28:24PM 4 points [-]

I believe the intent of EY's ban on violence was violence against identifiable individuals. Discussion and advocacy of violence against collective groups (the canonical example being supporting specific wars) is OK.