ZoltanBerrigomo comments on What can go wrong with the following protocol for AI containment? - Less Wrong

0 Post author: ZoltanBerrigomo 11 January 2016 11:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (29)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ZoltanBerrigomo 14 January 2016 03:41:38AM *  0 points [-]

I guess I am willing to bite the bullet and say that, as long as entity X prefers existence to nonexistence, you have done it no harm by bringing it into being. I realize this generates a number of repulsive-sounding conclusions, e.g., it becomes ethical to create entities which will live, by our 21st century standards, horrific lives.

At least some of them will tell you they had rather not been born.

If one is willing to accept my reasoning above, I think one can take one more leap and say that statistically as long as the vast majority of these entities will prefer existing to never having been brought into being, we are in the clear.

Comment author: compartmentalization 14 January 2016 05:06:59PM 1 point [-]

If you use the entities' preferences to decide what's ethical, then everything is (or can be), because you can just adjust their preferences accordingly.