moridinamael comments on Your transhuman copy is of questionable value to your meat self. - Less Wrong

12 Post author: Usul 06 January 2016 09:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (140)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 January 2016 08:29:08PM *  1 point [-]

So, elderly people that don't usefully contribute should be terminated?

Comment author: moridinamael 06 January 2016 09:51:12PM 4 points [-]

In a world with arbitrary forking of minds, people who won't willingly fork will become a minority. That's all I was implying. I made no statement about what "should" happen.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 January 2016 09:55:22PM *  0 points [-]

I was just taking that reasoning to the logical conclusion -- it applies just as well to the non productive elderly as it does to unneeded copies.

Comment author: moridinamael 08 January 2016 07:56:56PM 0 points [-]

Destroying an elderly person means destroying the line of their existence and extinguishing all their memories. Destroying a copy means destroying whatever memories it formed since forking and ending a "duplicate" consciousness.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 January 2016 10:45:01PM 0 points [-]

See you think that memories are somehow relevant to this conversation. I don't.

Comment author: MockTurtle 08 January 2016 01:37:26PM 0 points [-]

Surely there is a difference in kind here. Deleting a copy of a person because it is no longer useful is very different from deleting the LAST existing copy of a person for any reason.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 January 2016 06:09:34PM 0 points [-]

I see no such distinction. Murder is murder.