= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
ChristianKl comments on Consequences of the Non-Existence of Perfect Theoretical Rationality - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
That's not what your other post argues. It argues that perfect ratioanlity doesn't exist in a specific world which is fundamentally different than our own. You haven't shown that there are prolbems in our world for which perfect rationality doesn't exist.
If you want to make a deductive argument based on a bunch of abstract axioms you actually have to care about whether the axioms apply.
+1. Thanks for this feedback, I've edited as follows:
"If perfect rationality doesn't exist in at least some circumstances(edited), then if you want to assume it, you have to prove that a relevant class of problems has a perfectly rational agent."
The point I was making is that you can prove for a large class of real world problems that such a rational agent exists, so most things remain the same, except for the fact that you have to add an additional line in your proofs quoting a general result that proves a perfectly rational agent exists in the particular type of situation.