= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Tackling the subagent problem: preliminary analysis - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (16)
That's essentially what these posts are to me, except instead of a video game it's pen-and-paper with Stuart Armstrong as DM :).
It might be worth the extra motivation of writing up a framing with evil AI designers applying the proposed controls. I'll consider doing this on future posts.
Awesome! Stuart Armstrong be our Dungeon Master! :-) I haven't seen you write up your responses to our DM though. I'd like to see them.
I've made a few shots, e.g. at http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/mfq/presidents_asteroids_natural_categories_and/cjkr and http://lesswrong.com/lw/m25/high_impact_from_low_impact/cah1. There's no explicit role-playing, but I was very much in the mindset of trying to break the protection scheme.
I haven't been keeping up with these posts as well lately.