= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
RichardKennaway comments on The correct response to uncertainty is *not* half-speed - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (40)
Randomising the length of the first step will improve on the constant factor by about 2. Similar analysis to the non-adversarial case, and with the same ETA I just added to my earlier comment.
If you make the run lengths increase exponentially instead of linearly then you get O(k) unconditionally.
I know. I was improving the constant factor.
Ah yes, OK, essentially the same randomization helps against an adversary when you're growing exponentially as when you're growing only linearly. Fair enough.