Comparing with articles from a year ago, e.g. http://www.popsci.com/bill-gates-fears-ai-ai-researchers-know-better, this represents significant progress.
I'm a PhD student in Yoshua's lab. I've spoken with him about this issue several times, and he has moved on this issue, as have Yann and Andrew. From my perspective following this issue, there was tremendous progress in the ML community's attitude towards Xrisk.
I'm quite optimistic that such progress with continue, although pessimistic that it will be fast enough and that the ML community's attitude will be anything like sufficient for a positive outcome.
There has been continued progress at about the rate I would've expected -- maybe a bit faster. I think GPT-3 has helped change people's views somewhat, as have further appreciation of other social issues of AI.
LINK
Yoshua Bengio, one the world's leading expert on machine learning, and neural networks in particular, explains his view on these issues in an interview. Relevant quotes:
I think it's fair to say that Bengio has joined the ranks of AI researchers like his colleagues Andrew Ng and Yann LeCun who publicly express skepticism towards imminent human-extinction-level AI.