= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Dentin comments on The Fable of the Burning Branch - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (175)
Why isn't there another forest that traps girls?
Why aren't there some people immune to falling branches?
Why can't some boys be freed by boys?
But more generally, why bend over backwards to invent some convoluted justification for rape?
Why would you interpret it this way, when there are more charitable and better fitting interpretations? Not everything has to be about gender.
It's a fable about sexual politics. Gender is inescapable to the discussion.
When I reverse the genders, or make the branch lifters those with blonde hair, the story still works. I disagree with your statement.
The story would be improved by making it about hair color, actually.
If any of those other scenarios were applicable, the fable wouldn't have been written in the first place.