g_pepper comments on Is Spirituality Irrational? - Less Wrong

5 Post author: lisper 09 February 2016 01:42AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (429)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: g_pepper 04 March 2016 04:18:59AM 0 points [-]

If you don't care what I believe then you are under no obligations

As a matter of fact, I think the free will question is an interesting question, but not an instrumentally important question; I can't really think of anything I would do differently if I were to change my mind on the matter. This is especially true if you are right - in that case we'd both do whatever we're going to do and it wouldn't matter at all!

Free will and consciousness are both real subjective experiences, but neither one is objectively real. Their natures are very similar. I might even go so far as to say that they are the same phenomenon.

Interesting. The reason I asked the question is that there are some thinkers who deny the reality of free will but accept the reality of consciousness (e.g. Alex Rosenberg); I was curious if you are in that camp. It sounds as though you are not.

I recommend reading this book if you really want to understand (consciousness).

Glad to see you are open to at least some of Daniel Dennett's views! (He's a compatibilist, I believe.)

It's not that deep. It (the idea that the feeling that you are living in a classical Galilean universe is a perceptual illusion) just means that your perception of reality is different from actual reality in some pretty fundamental ways. The sun appears to revolve around the earth, but it doesn't. The chair you're sitting on seems like a solid object, but it isn't. "Up" always feels like it's the same direction, but it's not.

Understood. My confusion came from the term "Galilean Universe" which I assumed was a reference to Galileo (who was actually on-board with the idea of the Earth orbiting the Sun - that is one of the things that got him into some trouble with the authorities!)

Comment author: lisper 04 March 2016 07:19:01AM *  1 point [-]

we'd both do whatever we're going to do and it wouldn't matter at all!

Exactly right. I live my life as if I'm a classical conscious being with free will even though I know that metaphysically I'm not. It's kind of fun knowing the truth though. It gives me a lot of peace of mind.

I was curious if you are in that camp.

I'm not familiar with Rosenberg so I couldn't say.

Glad to see you are open to at least some of Daniel Dennett's views! (He's a compatibilist, I believe.)

Yes, I think you're right. (That video is actually well worth watching!)

Galilean Universe

Sorry, my bad. I meant it in the sense of Galilean relativity (a.k.a. Newtonian relativity, though Galileo actually thought of it first) where time rather than the speed of light is the same for all observers.