Comment on Religious and Rational?

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:05:32 GMT

I never claimed...

As I said, "intentionally designed to mislead".

""Caleb does not currently have an LW account, but he wants to discuss the post on LW. Therefore, he got a new account."

LOL. You're tripping up on tenses. If Caleb "does not currently have" (present tense), he could not have "got" (past tense). He only could "be getting" (present continuous) or "will get" (future).

others posted stuff on behalf of people

I notice that the post in the thread your link leads to says "This post was collaboratively written together with..."

Sure you don't want to reconsider taking OrphanWilde's advice?

Discuss