philh comments on If there was one element of statistical literacy that you could magically implant in every head, what would it be? - Less Wrong

3 Post author: enfascination 22 February 2016 07:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (67)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: philh 23 February 2016 11:12:29AM 1 point [-]

"Probability of appreciable rainfall" * "fraction of specified area which will receive it" is 0.7.

Or, I guess more properly it should be an integral over possible rainfall patterns. But "70% of London will definitely see lots of rain, and 30% will see none" and "we have 70% credence that all of London will see lots of rain, and 30% credence that no rain will fall in London" would both be reported as 70% chance of rain in London.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_of_precipitation

Comment author: Lumifer 23 February 2016 03:56:10PM 2 points [-]

"Probability of appreciable rainfall"

And what does that mean?

Comment author: ChristianKl 23 February 2016 11:30:49AM *  1 point [-]

You just replaced the word probability with credence/chance without explaining what's meant with it on a more basic level. The people where you complain that they don't know what probability means also won't know what credence means.

Comment author: philh 23 February 2016 12:56:50PM 1 point [-]

I was talking about weather forecasts, not trying to explain probability.

Comment author: ChristianKl 23 February 2016 04:16:14PM 0 points [-]

I think then you evaded the question Lumifer asked. The original post stated I'd like to see people have a clue what a probability actually is. Then Lumifer asked what it actually is. Explaining weather forcasts is besides the main point.

Comment author: philh 23 February 2016 04:58:48PM 0 points [-]

Yes, I wasn't answering the question as intended. But both kithpendragon and Lumifer were talking about the weather forecast, and it does seem at least vaguely relevant that even if you know exactly what probability is, that's not sufficient to understand "70% chance of rain".

Comment author: ChristianKl 23 February 2016 05:08:00PM 0 points [-]

Okay, I might have been to harsh.