DanArmak comments on If there was one element of statistical literacy that you could magically implant in every head, what would it be? - Less Wrong

3 Post author: enfascination 22 February 2016 07:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (67)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 24 February 2016 03:40:53PM *  0 points [-]

That's correct: my approach doesn't generalize to unique/rare events. The 'naive' or frequentist approach seems to work for weather predictions, and creates a simple intuition that's easier IMO to explain to laymen than more general approaches.

Comment author: Lumifer 24 February 2016 03:46:17PM 0 points [-]

this doesn't generalize.

What do you mean?

Comment author: DanArmak 24 February 2016 05:50:05PM *  0 points [-]

What Vaniver said: my approach breaks down for unique events. Edited for clarity.