Normal_Anomaly comments on Newcomb's Problem and Regret of Rationality - Less Wrong

64 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 31 January 2008 07:36PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (588)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: xrchz 22 November 2009 09:17:03AM 1 point [-]

Would that make you a supersuperintelligence? Since I presume by "picking randomly" you mean randomly to Omega, in other words Omega cannot find and process enough information to predict you well.

Otherwise what does "picking randomly" mean?

Comment author: whpearson 22 November 2009 10:57:05AM 4 points [-]

The definition of omega as something that can predict your actions leads it to have some weird powers. You could pick a box based on the outcome of a quantum event with a 50% chance, then omega would have to vanish in a puff of physical implausibility.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 23 November 2010 01:03:29PM *  4 points [-]

I suspect Omega would know you were going to do that, and would be able to put the box in a superposition dependent on the same quantum event, so that in the branches where you 1-box, box B contains $1million, and where you 2-box it's empty.

Comment author: bilbo 19 September 2012 02:41:42PM 0 points [-]

Exactly what I was thinking.