Jiro comments on The Thyroid Madness : Core Argument, Evidence, Probabilities and Predictions - Less Wrong

10 Post author: johnlawrenceaspden 14 March 2016 01:41AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (132)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 17 March 2016 03:49:57AM 0 points [-]

What I don't think you're allowed to do is say 'no problem, can't be anything to do with your car crash' when what you mean is 'your skull is not fractured'.

That example only works because fractures are involved in a subset of car crashes and car crashes are involved in a subset of fractures; either one can happen without the other. If that relation doesn't hold true, you would be allowed to say that. For instance, saying "no problem, can't be anything to do with your car crash' when what you mean is 'you weren't anywhere near a car at the time of the crash'.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 18 March 2016 05:31:50PM 0 points [-]

Agree again, thanks