Comment on Open thread, Mar. 14 - Mar. 20, 2016

Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:40:48 GMT

a common argument is

It might well be a common argument, but the correct question is whether it's a valid argument.

I do think it is a valid arguments (I might be wrong of course), many studies have highlighted the effect of education, parents, genes, environment, etc. So I find it unfair to blame someone for its problems since there are too many element to consider to give an accurate judgement.

Using a less sympathetic expression this is also known as the forced redistribution of wealth.

I don't like the idea of forced redistribution of wealth (taxes, namely), but in my opinion having a part of the population living in horrible conditions if not outright starving is worse, whether they deserve it or not.

I'd wager there is enough money in the first world to give everyone a "decent" life (admittedly depends on your definition of decent, let's say a shelter, food, education, health care and some leftovers for whatever you want to do). It is already implemented in various country and the States are not so far off in their own way so it is doable. However it is probably not be the optimal path in the long run for economic growth, I think if it is worth it (low confidence though).

Discuss