Clarity comments on "3 Reasons It’s Irrational to Demand ‘Rationalism’ in Social Justice Activism" - Less Wrong

9 Post author: PhilGoetz 29 March 2016 03:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (247)

Sort By: Controversial

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Clarity 30 March 2016 09:35:27PM 1 point [-]

By implication, m most compelling argument is violence.

Comment author: bogus 01 April 2016 05:13:07AM 0 points [-]

It's no coincidence that, according to the forerunner of 'social justice' activists, 'power flows from the barrel of a gun'. But then we don't like guns these days; they've become uncool, I guess.

Comment author: Viliam 31 March 2016 10:02:42AM 0 points [-]

The usual problem with violence is that when you start using it, others may reciprocate. And then suddenly things stop being so funny.

Comment author: Clarity 01 April 2016 12:41:14AM *  -1 points [-]
  • The usual problem with communication is that when you start using it, others may reciprocate. And then suddenly things stop being so funny.

  • The usual problem with satire is that when you start using it, others may reciprocate. And then suddenly things stop being so funny.

  • The usual problem with identifying usual problems is that when you start using it, others may reciprocate. And then suddenly things stop being so funny.

Comment author: Viliam 01 April 2016 09:18:05AM *  1 point [-]

Yeah, the point was that most people really dislike the idea of violence used against them. Especially those who write long texts complaining about "microaggressions". Yet, it's as if they somehow fail to realize that the easiest way to invite violence on themselves is to promote social norms that encourage violence (of course only against the other side, but this is the part that can easily get out of control).