gjm comments on "3 Reasons It’s Irrational to Demand ‘Rationalism’ in Social Justice Activism" - Less Wrong

9 Post author: PhilGoetz 29 March 2016 03:16PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (247)

Sort By: Leading

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gjm 01 April 2016 02:14:10PM 0 points [-]

P.S. For some comic relief [...]

Could you be more explicit about what's funny here?

(I'm pretty sure "Absolutely nothing wrong since 1911" is meant to be funny and is not at all a serious claim to have committed no mistakes or misdeeds in a century.)

Comment author: Lumifer 01 April 2016 02:53:54PM 3 points [-]

Oh dear, explaining jokes...

What I find funny is the juxtaposition of two elements. One element is clearly a playful light-natured wink-wink claim of "Oh, no, we certainly haven't been up to no good, how could you possibly think that". It implies both some misdeeds and not taking oneself very seriously.

The other element is dead serious, expresses guilt and wish for atonement, and would probably find humour on the topic to be inappropriate and in bad taste.

I like how these two elements stand together.

Comment author: gjm 01 April 2016 04:17:54PM 0 points [-]

Oh dear, explaining jokes...

Yeah, I know. Sorry!

playful light-hearted wink-wink [...] dead serious, expresses guilt [...]

Aha, gotcha. My guess at what you had in mind was some way off base. Thanks.

(I happen not to find it so funny, but if there's one thing less fun than explaining a joke it's explaining why a joke doesn't work for you so I'll leave it there :-).)