Viliam comments on Does Evidence Have To Be Certain? - Less Wrong

0 Post author: potato 30 March 2016 10:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Viliam 30 March 2016 08:43:39PM 0 points [-]

Is there something special about evidential statements that justifies changing their probabilities without having updated on something else?

Linguistically, "evidence" is derived from Latin "videre" which means 'to see'. The archetypal form of getting evidence is seeing something with your own eyes.

You change your probability of E, because you see E. Why do you believe that you see E? Your visual neurons were changed in response to the signals from your retina, which is an involuntary process.