johnlawrenceaspden comments on The Thyroid Madness: Two Apparently Contradictory Studies. Proof? - Less Wrong

7 Post author: johnlawrenceaspden 10 April 2016 08:21PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (76)

Comments (76)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 16 April 2016 05:01:23PM *  1 point [-]

I would suggest that your first two paragraphs should be (1) a hook, to make the reader interested; and (2) establishing your bona fides in the sense that you've read the literature and not just a random bloke who saw a programme on the BBC and now knows everything about thyroids.

Also don't be so bloody apologetic about intruding on their time and write more than a few lines. They always have the option to stop reading.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 18 April 2016 05:52:16PM *  1 point [-]

Actually I wrote back once you pointed that out, and we've swapped a few e-mails since, but now he's gone silent too. It is hard, this crankery.

I explained the whole bloody thing to him, with papers attached, and said:

What I would expect you to say is:

(a) We hear that all the time, and it's rubbish because [link]

(b) That's not a bad idea, but it can't be true because [implication that I have missed that isn't true]

(c) [redacted for fear of identifying correspondent]

and he said:

I [have specialised in a thyroid-related field but I don't see CFS patients] Therefore I have no experience nor opinion about the topic you want me to address.

Am I reading too much into this, or are those the words of a man trying not to get his name mixed up in a massive scandal? Are there in fact lots of people perfectly well aware that there is something dreadful going on but no-one wants to be the first to say it out loud in public?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit