= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
johnlawrenceaspden comments on How to provide a simple example to the requirement of falsifiability in the scientific method to a novice audience? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d){kind=logo}
Comments (57)
That could backfire quite spectacularly :-)
We should keep running the trials until we can get p<0.05 and prove the hypothesis!
If this would be enough to prove the effectiveness of rain-dancing, then we would develop 30 different styles of rain-dance, test each of them, and with a very high chance we would get p<0.05 on at least one of them.
Sadly, the medical industry is full of such publications, because publishing new ideas is rewarded more than reproducing already published experiments.
Hitting p<0.05 doesn't prove the hypotheis. That's not what the t-test does.