flame comments on [Link] Salon piece analyzing Donald Trump's appeal using rationality - Less Wrong

-13 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 April 2016 04:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (65)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment deleted 24 April 2016 05:35:17AM [-]
Comment author: Dustin 24 April 2016 03:12:50PM *  1 point [-]

the elite are against it while everyone else is for it

You're living in a filter bubble if you think this.

Comment author: Dustin 04 May 2016 10:06:13PM 1 point [-]

I'm not sure why I got downvoted for this. Unless you define "elite" as those against it, this statement is clearly untrue.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 April 2016 04:32:35PM -1 points [-]

everyone else is for it

Evidence?

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 24 April 2016 07:39:11PM 5 points [-]

According to Pew Research Center, "More than eight-in-ten Republicans (84%) say the nation should impose tighter restrictions on immigration, compared with about six-in-ten Democrats (58%)."

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 24 April 2016 08:37:43PM 1 point [-]

That doesn't seem like "everyone" to me, unless you count 16% of Republicans and 42% of Democrats as "elite."

Comment author: Viliam 25 April 2016 10:28:39AM 6 points [-]

Okay, so it's not "everyone", but it's a majority.

So you have a majority of voters wanting something, a politician saying he will deliver, the politician has wide support... and this all makes the voters irrational because... uhm... because neuroscience explains that the voters actually have emotions, oh the horrors!

I suppose next time I care about something, I should vote for a politician who promises the exact opposite, so that no neuroscientist can suspect me of being a helpless victim of my own opinions. /s

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 26 April 2016 02:31:52AM 1 point [-]

I think we have some slippage of concepts here. The majority of voters want tighter restrictions, but only half agree with Trump's position on a ban on Muslim migration.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 27 April 2016 03:12:12AM 1 point [-]

From the article you linked:

While 71 percent of Republican voters supported the ban

I don't believe any other Republican has supported the ban, so that the issue is an overwhelming win for Trump in the Republican Party.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 27 April 2016 03:23:04AM 0 points [-]

Yup, agreed it's a win for him in the Republican party.

Comment deleted 24 April 2016 07:00:54PM [-]
Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 25 April 2016 04:22:50AM -1 points [-]

And given the grammar and back history of this user, I'm pretty since it's another Eugene Neir sock puppet. Also reported to the admin.

Comment author: knb 25 April 2016 07:47:03AM 0 points [-]

Or maybe he was referencing how the Poles' polls are indeed very anti-immigration. ;-)

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 25 April 2016 04:21:28AM 0 points [-]

This comment was -3 karma last time I looked. Now, it's +6. Given its extremist language, I decided to look up this account. Having looked at the history of this account, I'm pretty since it's another Eugene Neir sock puppet. Hope you had fun voting down this post, Eugene Neir - reported to the admin.