TheOtherDave comments on Disguised Queries - Less Wrong

57 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 09 February 2008 12:05AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (104)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 17 December 2011 04:22:58PM 1 point [-]

I suppose you do technically scrape through in adhering to No. 7 as it is presented in that wikipedia passage based on two technicalities. That it it is only adultery if you sleep with a married woman and that being the partner of the adulterer doesn't qualify. (I'm a little skeptical of that passage actually). Come to think of it you may get a reprieve for a third exception if it is the case that the other guy was married to a guy (ambiguous).

Comment author: TheOtherDave 17 December 2011 04:33:30PM 0 points [-]

The guy in question was married to a woman at the time.

Agreed about the technicalities.