HungryHobo comments on Improving long-run civilisational robustness - Less Wrong

11 Post author: RyanCarey 10 May 2016 11:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: HungryHobo 10 May 2016 04:56:24PM *  1 point [-]

I can sort of imagine a world where some extremely well funded terrorists engineer/manufacture a few dozen really nasty diseases and release them in hundreds/thousands of locations at once, (though most terrorists wouldn't because such an attack would hurt their own side as much or more than anyone else) that might seriously hurt society as a whole but most of the time the backlash against terrorism seems more dangerous than the actual terrorists.

Comment author: James_Miller 10 May 2016 08:32:21PM 3 points [-]

Consider terrorists who release viruses that target or spare specific populations. If gene editing technologies make offence much easier than defense, and allows lone individuals to make these viruses such terrorism could be world-ending.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 13 May 2016 06:15:03AM 2 points [-]

I would put backlash to terrorism as part of the risk of terrorism