DanArmak comments on Information Hazards and Community Hazards - Less Wrong

1 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 14 May 2016 08:54PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 15 May 2016 03:10:47PM 3 points [-]

we can for the most part collaboratively truth-seek on most issues, except those defined as 'politics',

This is true not only connotationally (political topics cause humans to behave this way), but also denotationally: those topics which cause humans to behave this way, we call political (or 'tribal').

Comment author: Lumifer 16 May 2016 12:47:09AM 1 point [-]

Nope. Consider the whole wide world of incentives. If a discussion leads to significant real-world results, and not just of political kind, participants have incentives to attempt turn this discussion to their advantage and they regularly do. Truth-seeking is a very common casualty.

For simple examples think about money, sex, etc.