Lumifer comments on Thoughts on hacking aromanticism? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (37)
I see two ways to hack the need for validation, but they sort of run in opposite directions: creating, or hanging around, a community where you're the most or one of the most competent person around. This helps a lot because validation is fluid, is not necessarily related to romantic appreciation but also to social status.
A second way that I sometimes practice is to go in a place full of attractive people and begin looking each in the eyes, smiling. More often than not, they will reciprocate and it doesn't take much to fill your romantic validation meter, we are (at least, males are) very good at self-deluding.
Bonus tip: calisthenics or a home-gym are effective ways of training, you do not need to necessarily run to train alone.
I don't recommend this. It leads to a variety of undesirable consequences, from letting your standards slip to developing unhealthy levels of arrogance.
How about getting a balance? Sometimes you could hang around a community where you're one of the most competent people around, and at other times you could put yourself in a position where you're a student to most of the other members.
This seems to get the benefit MrMind was describing without the drawback you've identified.
It's hard to argue against balance :-) at this point we're in the "it depends" situation. It could work or it could fail.
However this advice contradicts a heuristic I have: "Try not to spend time surrounded by idiots".
A time-honored heuristic if there ever was one. But the opposite is just as depressing.
You can be happy in a group of peers... or as a teacher.