scarcegreengrass comments on Revitalising Less Wrong is not a lost purpose - Less Wrong

4 Post author: casebash 15 June 2016 08:10AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: scarcegreengrass 28 June 2016 07:50:27PM 1 point [-]

I think passive_fist was saying that they considered certain comments irrational, and that those fell into the (broad) category of libertarianism. That c is an element of set I and set L, not that L is a subset of I.