Lumifer comments on Open thread, Jul. 11 - Jul. 17, 2016 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (131)
If true this has some spectacular implications for computing (long term).
http://phys.org/news/2016-07-refutes-famous-physical.html
Some of the limits of computation, how much you could theoretically do with a certain amount of energy are based on what appear to have been incorrect beliefs about information processing and entropy.
As far as I can see, the experiment has shown that what was considered to be the lower bound is actually not.
However I don't understand how the claim of "no lower bound at all" necessarily follows. For all we know there is just a different, lower (lower bound).
I found it odd as well but I think it's because it implies that the theoretical reason for that lower bound may be invalid.
There's likely going to turn out to be a different theoretical lower bound for some other reason but right now we don't have that theoretical reason.