Manfred comments on Open thread, Jul. 18 - Jul. 24, 2016 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: MrMind 18 July 2016 07:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (123)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 18 July 2016 11:53:55PM 8 points [-]

Yes, it's entitled "Good and Real." The shadowy cabal behind LessWrong wrote it under one of their other pseudonyms, "Gary Drescher."

Comment author: Manfred 18 July 2016 11:56:09PM *  8 points [-]

(Note: this is not actually true. But Good and Real recapitulates most of the points you'll see in the philosophy-related sequences, with less focus on the basics and more on elaborating philosophical arguments. If this is the content you want to share, it might be a good choice.)

Comment author: blf 29 July 2016 01:09:57AM 0 points [-]

Thank you.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 19 July 2016 03:48:58PM 0 points [-]

Added to my Amazon wish list. Do you know of any other books one should be aware of?

Comment author: Manfred 20 July 2016 03:30:14AM 2 points [-]

There's probably some books by Dan Dennett that the LW articles that deal with philosophy of mind drew from, but I've mostly been exposed to Dennett through articles, like Intentional Systems and Eliminate the Middletoad!

On evolution, essential reading is The Selfish Gene.

On heuristics and biases, Thinking Fast and Slow (the first half, at least), and Dan Ariely's books are good reads.

I'm not aware of anything similar to the sequences in terms of intersection of Bayesianism, heuristics and biases, and trying to teach how to think about confusing things. Unfortunately.

Comment author: iarwain1 20 July 2016 01:40:29PM 1 point [-]

I really like Sean Carroll's The Big Picture as an intro to rationality and naturalism for the general public. It covers pretty much all the topics in RfAItZ, along with several others (esp. physics stuff). It's shorter and a lot less technical than RfAItZ, but it's readable and I thought it does a good job of laying out the basic perspectives.