I was trying to humorously point out a common false assumption: that improving gender equality would necessarily benefit women relative to men.
consider ways in which they can avoid or soften this sort of framing in the future.
I'm not good at tone (and this does get me in trouble) so could you please explain why what I wrote might be considered offensive?
To stick my oar in for a minute, as I am wont to do, I didn't find your comment offensive. That which is true should never be offensive, and those are some real metrics by which gender inequality can be measured.
However I didn't get "humorous". I thought it was intended to be serious, though I could interpret the intended message in several different ways - interpretations to which my responses could range anywhere from "total agreement" to "not even worth engaging", so I decided to see where the discussion went before joining...
I got lots of helpful comments in my first post, so I'll try a second: I want to develop a list of criteria by which to evaluate a presidency. Coming up with criteria and metrics on the economy is pretty easy, but I'd like to ask for suggestions on proxies for evaluating: