The executive summary would be that TAPs are cfar discovering one of these. You can hit various systems with the decomposition hammer and you'll start to see the more common pieces crop up over and over. OODA loop, GTD, analogical reasoning, sorting schemes for prioritization. The tell tale sign of one of these is that you can feed it to itself, which indicates it is flexible enough to take all sorts of arguments.
I'll try to write a short post on it at some point.
Thanks, that's useful! A post on this some time sounds good.
[Epistemic status: mostly confident, but being this intentional is experimental]
This year, I'm focusing on two traits: resilience and conscientiousness. I think these (or the fact that I lack them) are my biggest barriers to success. Also: identifying them as goals for 2017 doesn't mean I'll stop developing them in 2018. A year is just a nice, established amount of time in which progress can actually be made. This plan is a more intentional version of techniques I've used to improve myself over the last few years. I have outside verification that I'm more responsible, high-functioning, and resilient than I was several years ago. I have managed to reduce my SSRI dose, and I have finished more important tasks this year than last year.
First, I want to talk about my criteria for success. Without illustrating the end result, or figuring out how to measure it, I could finish out the year with a false belief that I'd made progress. If you plan something without success criteria, you run the same risk. I also believe that most of the criteria should be observable by a third party, i.e. hard to fake.