Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

fburnaby comments on Explaining vs. Explaining Away - Less Wrong

46 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 17 March 2008 01:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (98)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fburnaby 23 March 2010 11:20:07PM 1 point [-]

I think we completely agree about all of this, then. I'm just letting the terminological confusion that was introduced by Ian C's comment muddy my own attempts at articulating myself.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that, regardless of the result -- free will exists, or free will doesn't exist -- there's no reason to think that this result would have anything to do with the question of whether reductionism is a good research programme. We would still attempt to reduce theories as much as possible, even if free will was "magic".

The part about "what current reductionists believe" -- I assumed that most reductionists think of free-will as nonexistent, or an illusion. So the hypothetical case where free will does exist (magical or otherwise) would leave them hypotheically wrong about it.

Myself, I'm a fan of Dennett's stance -- might as well call the thing we have "free will" even though there's nothing magic about it. Sorry for the long string of muddled comments. I'll try thinking harder the first time around next time.