DaveInNYC2 comments on The So-Called Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - Less Wrong

13 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 23 April 2008 06:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (20)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DaveInNYC2 23 April 2008 06:27:23PM 0 points [-]

I'm re-going through posts, and a question after reading The Quantum Arena. There you state that if you know the entire amplitude distribution, you can predict what subsequent distributions will be. Am I correct in assuming that this is independent of (observations, "wave function collapses", or whatever it is when we say that we find a particle at a certain point)?

For example, let's I have a particle that is "probably" going to go in a straight to from x to y, i.e. at each point in time there is a huge bulge in the amplitude distribution at the appropriate point on the line from x to y. If I observe the particle on the opposite side of the moon at some point (i.e. where the amplitude is non-zero, but still tiny), does the particle still have the same probability as before of "jumping" back onto the line from x to y?

As I write this, I am starting to suspect that I am asking a Wrong Question. Crap.