Luke_A_Somers comments on Decoherence as Projection - Less Wrong

15 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 02 May 2008 06:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RichardS 16 September 2010 02:26:57PM 2 points [-]

This article has left me confused. I don't see how this notion of phase relates back to a locally-evolving amplitude distribution over a space of configurations, if those configurations are merely the locations of some indistinguishable lumps in a field. How do these phases become manifest in the configuration space? It seems like there must be more to the configuration space than just a set of locations for each type of "particle", but previous articles have claimed otherwise.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 23 April 2012 02:32:06PM 1 point [-]

The configuration space is a field where there's a number at each place. This number is a complex number.

Does that help?