Adirian comments on Bell's Theorem: No EPR "Reality" - Less Wrong

16 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 04 May 2008 04:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (28)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Adirian 05 May 2008 12:23:08AM 0 points [-]

I think you read something which left out something; Belle's Theorem disproved "neo-realism," which is the idea that there was a classical-physics explanation, i/e, with real particles with real properties. It's the model EPR was trying to assert over the Copenhagen interpretation - and that, indeed, was its only purpose, and I find it odd that you bring that thought experiment up out of the context of its intent.

Well, actually, Everette's Many-Worlds actually repermits classical physics within its confines, and hence real particles, as do other superdimensional interpretations - within his model, you're still permitted all the trappings of classical physics. (As they break an assumption of normality in Belle's Theorem, namely, that there is only one universe, or in the case of superdimensionality, that the universe doesn't extend in other directions we can only detect abstractly.)