Vaniver comments on Decoherence is Simple - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (57)
I see, thank you. Does it add too much noise if I ask such questions, should I rather not yet read the sequences if I sometimes have to inquire about such matters? Or should I ask somewhere else?
I was looking up this table of mathematical symbols that stated that ~ does read as 'has distribution' and stopped looking any further since I'm dealing with probabilities here. I guess it should have been obvious to me to expect a logical operator. I was only used to the notation not and ¬ as the negation of a proposition. I'll have to adjust my perceived intelligence downwards.
Others that gets used a lot in various contexts are !Y, Y^c (for Y complement). There are probably more, but I can't think of them at the moment.
Y with a bar over it also gets used (though be careful as this more commonly means closure of Y, or, well, quite a few other things...)