Silas comments on Decoherence is Falsifiable and Testable - Less Wrong

20 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 07 May 2008 07:54AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Silas 07 May 2008 06:36:22PM 7 points [-]

So, decoherence is a valid scientific theory because it makes the same, correct predictions as the one involving collapse, but is simpler.

There, that didn't take 2800 words, now, did it?