= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Tim_Tyler comments on The Dilemma: Science or Bayes? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (185)
Re:"So far as I know, MWI and collapse both make the exact same predictions" - nope:
``Many worlds is often referred to as a theory, rather than just an interpretation, by those who propose that many worlds can make testable predictions (such as David Deutsch) or is falsifiable (such as Everett) [...]''
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
The issue is laid out in the FAQ:
Q36 What unique predictions does many-worlds make?
http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm#unique
Q37 Could we detect other Everett-worlds?
http://www.hedweb.com/manworld.htm#detect