= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
timtyler comments on Science Isn't Strict Enough - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (60)
Tim Tyler: um... maybe I'm completely and utterly not understanding the point, but doesn't the knowledge that the laws of probability are the proper way to represent subjective uncertainty, itself, solve the problem of induction?
Or am I utterly missing some concept here?
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction