Nick_Tarleton comments on Faster Than Science - Less Wrong

14 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 20 May 2008 12:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 20 May 2008 03:22:35PM 1 point [-]

Suppose you came up with some way of generating hypotheses that was completely crazy - say, pumping a robot-controlled Ouija board with the digits of pi - and the resulting suggestions kept on getting verified experimentally. The pure ideal essence of Science wouldn't skip a beat. The pure ideal essence of Bayes would burst into flames and die.

Why? Methinks Bayes would eventually conclude there's some unexpected correlation between reality and the Ouija board.

(This goes for what ME said as well - if Ouija boards actually generated useful hypotheses, eventually scientists would wise up and start using them all the time.)