frelkins comments on A Broken Koan - Less Wrong

6 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 24 May 2008 07:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (11)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: frelkins 25 May 2008 05:37:12AM 1 point [-]

@Mitchell Porter

I see you are not very familiar with Buddhist thought. Might I suggest you read some Nagarjuna? The definition of what is "real" in Buddhism is very rational and precise.

In these terms, time is certainly not "real," and while there is consciousness, there is no self-existent "we." Time and we are certainly conditionally dependent non-entities. I believe modern physics holds this view as well.

However this doesn't mean we don't experience these things or that time doesn't inexorably pass. Buddhism never denies the material universe, you know.