Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Eliezer's Post Dependencies; Book Notification; Graphic Designer Wanted

0Eliezer_Yudkowsky10 June 2008 01:18AM

I'm going to try and produce summaries of the quantum physics series today or tomorrow.

Andrew Hay has produced a neat graph of (explicit) dependencies among my Overcoming Bias posts - an automatically generated map of the "Followup to" structure:

Eliezer's Post Dependencies (includes only posts with dependencies)
All of my posts (including posts without dependencies)

Subscribe here to future email notifications for when the popular book comes out (which may be a year or two later), and/or I start producing e-books:

Notifications for the rationality book, or for any other stuff I produce

(Thanks to Christian Rovner for setting up PHPList.)

Sometime in the next two weeks, I need to get at least one Powerpoint presentation of mine re-produced to professional standards of graphic design.  Ideally, in a form that will let me make small modifications myself.  This is likely to lead into other graphic design work on producing the ebooks, redesigning my personal website, creating Bayesian Conspiracy T-shirts, etc.

I am not looking for an unpaid volunteer.  I am looking for a professional graphic designer who can do sporadic small units of work quickly.

Desired style for the presentation:  Professional-looking and easy-to-read (as opposed to flamboyant / elaborate).  I already have the presentation content, in black text on white background.  I would like it to look like it was produced by a grownup, which is beyond my own skill.  Emails to sentience@pobox.com, please include your fee schedule and a link to your portfolio.

Comments (14)

Andrew310 June 2008 01:44:07AM0 points [-]

The url for the listing of all of Eliezer's posts is actually now at: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~andwhay/postlist.html

Eliezer_Yudkowsky10 June 2008 02:10:44AM0 points [-]

Fixed.

Peter_de_Blanc10 June 2008 02:29:01AM0 points [-]

Re the post dependencies graphs: why not treat these as posets, and remove the extraneous arrows?

Nick_Tarleton10 June 2008 02:44:11AM0 points [-]

The extraneous arrows are helpful in indicating when a post returns to an earlier point.

BTW, it looks like the black arrows are "followup to", blue "previously in series", green "continuation of", and cyan "prerequisite". It'd be interesting to see in-text links as well, if that graph wouldn't be unreadably busy.

evtujo10 June 2008 04:18:20AM0 points [-]

A couple months ago a tried to create a graphviz diagram of all of Eliezer's posts. With ALL dependancies to ALL postings in one diagram. It probably would have been a mess to try to decipher the result but in any case every variation I tried core dumped when generating the graphic. Too many posts. Too many dependencies. :) Keep up the good work.

jimmy210 June 2008 07:40:18AM0 points [-]

I find it funny that Eliezer set the probability options to subjective things like "I 'will probably' buy your book" instead of putting % ranges.

I put "will definitely", even though I recognize a significant non zero chance (say 5%) of not buying the book, just because it seems qualitatively closer than "will probably".

botogol210 June 2008 08:25:31AM0 points [-]

very cool!

Recovering_irrationalist10 June 2008 12:47:04PM0 points [-]

Subscribe here to future email notifications

Just a heads up - the confirmation mail landed in my gmail spam folder.

Nick_Tarleton10 June 2008 12:57:39PM0 points [-]

Mine, too. Thanks, RI.

Richard_Hollerith210 June 2008 01:35:43PM0 points [-]

Here is a web page with Eliezer's OB posts all on one (very long) page.

David_Pennock10 June 2008 07:48:57PM0 points [-]

You might try guru.com

stuart10 June 2008 09:15:48PM0 points [-]

Thanks Andrew! That's great!

Andrew_Hay10 June 2008 10:21:50PM0 points [-]

I've tried my best to squeeze the biggest graph into an acceptable width. But with Dot, layout engine I use, it won't seem to squeeze the width past a certain point (because of how it seems to put nodes into ranks I believe).

While it looks cool seeing the whole picture, it would be nicer if you didn't need to scroll all over the place. I'll post the code later on if anyone wants to tinker with it (apologies for the mess some of it is), and any suggestions for changes would be appreciated.

I'll have a new change coming up in the next day or so too, so look forward to it, it should be real neat.

Douglas_Knight311 June 2008 05:36:44AM0 points [-]

Andrew Hay, Could you split the big graph into dense pieces? Independent of that, do you know of an algorithm to find such pieces?