Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

deo2 comments on LA-602 vs. RHIC Review - Less Wrong

30 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 June 2008 10:00AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (61)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: deo2 20 June 2008 06:04:44AM 0 points [-]

By the way, does anybody have information about soviet h-bomb research? Is there any information about russian physicists making similar calculations?

Comment author: gwern 08 June 2012 08:29:48PM 0 points [-]

The Soviet archives are still very closed, and what's open is often not known in the West, so we can't make any strong argument from silence.

In this specific case, any Soviet examination or lack of examination is weaker evidence than it looks. The Soviets learned of the possibility & feasibility of h-bombs through spies, so they could have had access to this report or their spies' dismissal of the possibility (based on the report) or they could reason that the Americans who were sufficiently insightful to invent h-bombs (where they couldn't) were also insightful enough to check the safety issues.

Finally, given the general environmental fallout from all sorts of Soviet programs, it's not clear they ever cared about such issues very much. (For example, the Tsar Bomba was the result of a crash program for a political demonstration where the teams knew their designs and calculations were rushed & unreliable, and hence the bomb could have fizzled or been another Bikini Atoll or something. It was still detonated.)