thomblake comments on The Moral Void - Less Wrong

31 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 30 June 2008 08:52AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (105)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 08 February 2012 08:56:13PM 1 point [-]

People have been demonstrably willing to make everyone live at a lower standard of living rather than let a tiny minority grow obscenely rich and everyone else being moderately well off.

Sure, horrible people.

mind-killed

Comment author: [deleted] 08 February 2012 09:16:22PM *  4 points [-]

You do realize that valuing equality in itself to any extent at all is always (because of opportunity cost at least) an example of this:

People have been demonstrably willing to make everyone live at a lower standard of living rather than let a tiny minority grow obscenely rich and everyone else be moderately well off.

But I agree with you in sense. Historically lots of horrible people have vastly overpaid (often in blood) and overvalued that particular good according to my values too.

Comment author: thomblake 08 February 2012 09:59:27PM 2 points [-]

You do realize that valuing equality in itself to any extent at all is always (because of opportunity cost at least) a example of this

Yes.

Comment author: [deleted] 08 February 2012 11:19:19PM 1 point [-]

Ok just checking, surprisingly many people miss this. :)

Comment author: DanielLC 20 June 2012 05:44:09AM 5 points [-]

You do realize that valuing equality in itself to any extent at all is always (because of opportunity cost at least) an example of this:

Are you sure?

If you take a concave function, such as a log, of the net happiness of each individual, and maximize the sum, you'd always prefer equality to inequality when net happiness is held constant, and you'd always prefer a higher minimum happiness regardless of inequality.

Comment author: Articulator 27 March 2014 06:24:53AM 1 point [-]

Excellent! Thanks for the mathematical model! I've been trying to work out how to describe this principle for ages.